Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Beattie Feathers vs Thomas Campbell
Beattie Feathers: 48th pct vs Thomas Campbell: 48th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Beattie Feathers vs Thomas Campbell
Beattie Feathers: 48th pct vs Thomas Campbell: 48th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Beattie Feathers
Beattie Feathers: 66th pct vs Thomas Campbell: 51st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Thomas Campbell
Thomas Campbell: 59th pct vs Beattie Feathers: 50th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Beattie Feathers vs Thomas Campbell
Beattie Feathers: 0 titles vs Thomas Campbell: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Beattie Feathers vs Thomas Campbell
Beattie Feathers: 8 seasons vs Thomas Campbell: 7 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Thomas Campbell
Thomas Campbell: 53.8% vs Beattie Feathers: 49.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Beattie Feathers
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Thomas Campbell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-3 • SRS 11.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
+14.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#18
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Thomas Campbell
Nearest year 1922 • Virginia
4-4-1 • SRS 6.2 • SP Overall —
Beattie Feathers holds a 5.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beattie Feathers | |||||
| NC State | 1944-1951 | 8 | 37-38-3 | -0.2 | 11.9Highest peak |
| Thomas Campbell | |||||
| North Carolina | 1916-1919 | 2 | 9-7-1 | -2.9 | 2.4 |
| Virginia | 1922-1922 | 1 | 4-4-1 | 6.2Best quality | 6.2 |
Closing takeaway
37-38-3 • 49.4% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
11.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
NC State 1946
SRS 11.9
Worst Season
NC State 1950
SRS -7.9
Biggest Improvement
NC State 1946
14.4 SRS
13-11-2 • 53.8% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
59th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Virginia 1922
SRS 6.2
Worst Season
North Carolina 1919
SRS -8.2
Biggest Improvement
Virginia 1922
14.4 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.