Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Ray Goff
Ray Goff: 76th pct vs Chuck Amato: 63rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Chuck AmatoRay Goff
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Ray Goff vs Chuck Amato
Ray Goff: 78th pct vs Chuck Amato: 76th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Chuck Amato
Chuck Amato: 59th pct vs Ray Goff: 55th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Amato vs Ray Goff
Chuck Amato: 0 titles vs Ray Goff: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Amato vs Ray Goff
Chuck Amato: 7 seasons vs Ray Goff: 7 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Ray Goff vs Chuck Amato
Ray Goff: 57.4% vs Chuck Amato: 57.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Ray Goff and Chuck Amato look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarRay Goff and Chuck Amato look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Chuck Amato
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 8.8
82th pct
Strong
Ray Goff
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 9.2
83th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Chuck AmatoRay Goff
EliteStrongAverageLean
1989Actual season year • SRS range -5.8 to 17.02006
Active comparison point
Chuck Amato • 2002
2002 NC State
Best seasonBiggest improvement11-3 • SRS 16.1 • SP Overall 19.2
Win %
78.6%
YoY SRS
+9.3
SP Off / Def
38.2 / 20.6
Finish
#12
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Ray Goff
Nearest year 1995 • Georgia
6-6 • SRS 3.7 • SP Overall 8.2
Chuck Amato holds a 12.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +7.5 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Amato | |||||
| NC State | 2000-2006 | 7 | 49-37 | 6.7 | 16.1 |
| Ray Goff | |||||
| Georgia | 1989-1995 | 7 | 46-34-1 | 6.7 | 17.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Chuck Amato
49-37 • 57.0% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
59th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
NC State 2002
SRS 16.1
Worst Season
NC State 2006
SRS -4.0
Biggest Improvement
NC State 2002
9.3 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Ray Goff
46-34-1 • 57.4% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
76th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Georgia 1992
SRS 17.0
Worst Season
Georgia 1990
SRS -5.8
Biggest Improvement
Georgia 1991
14.7 SRS