Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Philip Montgomery vs Fred Goldsmith
Philip Montgomery: 38th pct vs Fred Goldsmith: 35th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Fred GoldsmithPhilip Montgomery
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Fred Goldsmith
Fred Goldsmith: 54th pct vs Philip Montgomery: 50th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Fred Goldsmith
Fred Goldsmith: 73rd pct vs Philip Montgomery: 69th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Fred Goldsmith vs Philip Montgomery
Fred Goldsmith: 0 titles vs Philip Montgomery: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Fred Goldsmith
Fred Goldsmith: 10 seasons vs Philip Montgomery: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Philip Montgomery
Philip Montgomery: 44.8% vs Fred Goldsmith: 36.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Philip Montgomery has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgePhilip Montgomery has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Fred Goldsmith
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -6.8
36th pct
Lower end
Philip Montgomery
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -3.7
45th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Fred GoldsmithPhilip Montgomery
EliteStrongAverageLean
Fred Goldsmith: 1994 Duke
1989Actual season year • SRS range -14.3 to 7.12022
Active comparison point
Fred Goldsmith • 1994
1994 Duke
Best seasonNew stop: Duke8-4 • SRS 7.1 • SP Overall 8.2
Win %
66.7%
YoY SRS
+8.1
SP Off / Def
36.9 / 30.9
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Philip Montgomery
Nearest year 2015 • Tulsa
6-7 • SRS -5.3 • SP Overall -8.5
Fred Goldsmith holds a 12.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +4.5 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Goldsmith | |||||
| Rice | 1989-1993 | 5 | 23-31-1 | -2.6Best quality | 0.1 |
| Duke | 1994-1998 | 5 | 17-39 | -4.7 | 7.1Highest peak |
| Philip Montgomery | |||||
| Tulsa | 2015-2022 | 8 | 43-53 | -3.7 | 5.9Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Fred Goldsmith
40-70-1 • 36.5% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
73rd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Duke 1994
SRS 7.1
Worst Season
Duke 1996
SRS -14.3
Biggest Improvement
Duke 1997
9.7 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Philip Montgomery
43-53 • 44.8% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
-12.0 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Tulsa 2016
SRS 5.9
Worst Season
Tulsa 2018
SRS -12.0
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 2019
11.9 SRS