Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Andy McCollum
Andy McCollum: 25th pct vs Carl Franks: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Carl FranksAndy McCollum
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Andy McCollum
Andy McCollum: 30th pct vs Carl Franks: 24th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Carl Franks
Carl Franks: 54th pct vs Andy McCollum: 46th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Andy McCollum vs Carl Franks
Andy McCollum: 0 titles vs Carl Franks: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Andy McCollum
Andy McCollum: 7 seasons vs Carl Franks: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Andy McCollum
Andy McCollum: 43.0% vs Carl Franks: 13.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Carl Franks has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeCarl Franks has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Carl Franks
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.8
20th pct
Lower end
Andy McCollum
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -16.2
12th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Carl FranksAndy McCollum
EliteStrongAverageLean
1999Actual season year • SRS range -25.5 to -2.22005
Active comparison point
Carl Franks • 2003
2003 Duke
Best season2-5 • SRS -5.1 • SP Overall -4.0
Win %
28.6%
YoY SRS
+2.3
SP Off / Def
27.2 / 31.3
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Andy McCollum
Nearest year 2003 • Middle Tennessee
4-8 • SRS -9.2 • SP Overall -15.7
Carl Franks holds a 4.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -3.2 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Franks | |||||
| Duke | 1999-2003 | 5 | 7-45 | -11.1 | -5.1 |
| Andy McCollum | |||||
| Middle Tennessee | 1999-2005 | 7 | 34-45 | -11.0 | -2.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Carl Franks
7-45 • 13.5% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
54th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Duke 2003
SRS -5.1
Worst Season
Duke 2001
SRS -19.8
Biggest Improvement
Duke 2002
12.4 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Andy McCollum
34-45 • 43.0% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
25th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Middle Tennessee 2001
SRS -2.2
Worst Season
Middle Tennessee 1999
SRS -25.5
Biggest Improvement
Middle Tennessee 2000
18.6 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.