Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: NP Stauffer vs Jack Hagerty
NP Stauffer: 54th pct vs Jack Hagerty: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
NP StaufferJack Hagerty
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Jack Hagerty
Jack Hagerty: 75th pct vs NP Stauffer: 69th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: NP Stauffer vs Jack Hagerty
NP Stauffer: 34th pct vs Jack Hagerty: 33rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jack Hagerty vs NP Stauffer
Jack Hagerty: 0 titles vs NP Stauffer: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jack Hagerty vs NP Stauffer
Jack Hagerty: 17 seasons vs NP Stauffer: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: NP Stauffer
NP Stauffer: 63.6% vs Jack Hagerty: 57.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
NP Stauffer
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Jack Hagerty
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
NP StaufferJack Hagerty
EliteStrongAverageLean
NP Stauffer: 1909 Ole Miss
1896Actual season year • SRS range -15.0 to 15.61948
Active comparison point
NP Stauffer • 1910
1910 Ole Miss
Best seasonBiggest improvement7-1 • SRS 13.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
87.5%
YoY SRS
+16.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jack Hagerty
Nearest year 1932 • Georgetown
2-6-1 • SRS -15.0 • SP Overall —
NP Stauffer holds a 28.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP Stauffer | |||||
| Dickinson (PA) | 1896-1899 | 4 | 25-16-3 | -7.4 | -3.0 |
| Ole Miss | 1909-1911 | 3 | 17-7-2 | 4.1Best quality | 13.2 |
| Jack Hagerty | |||||
| Georgetown | 1932-1948 | 14 | 63-45-10 | -1.6 | 15.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →NP Stauffer
42-23-5 • 63.6% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
-9.9 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Ole Miss 1910
SRS 13.2
Worst Season
Dickinson (PA) 1898
SRS -9.9
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1910
16.1 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Jack Hagerty
63-45-10 • 57.6% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
15.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Georgetown 1940
SRS 15.6
Worst Season
Georgetown 1932
SRS -15.0
Biggest Improvement
Georgetown 1940
9.6 SRS