Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Kliff Kingsbury vs Matt Luke
Kliff Kingsbury: 50th pct vs Matt Luke: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Matt LukeKliff Kingsbury
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Kliff Kingsbury vs Matt Luke
Kliff Kingsbury: 55th pct vs Matt Luke: 52nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Matt Luke
Matt Luke: 97th pct vs Kliff Kingsbury: 91st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Kliff Kingsbury vs Matt Luke
Kliff Kingsbury: 0 titles vs Matt Luke: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Kliff Kingsbury
Kliff Kingsbury: 6 seasons vs Matt Luke: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Kliff Kingsbury
Kliff Kingsbury: 46.7% vs Matt Luke: 41.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Matt Luke and Kliff Kingsbury look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarMatt Luke and Kliff Kingsbury look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Matt Luke
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 8.1
81th pct
Strong
Kliff Kingsbury
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 6.8
77th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Matt LukeKliff Kingsbury
EliteStrongAverageLean
2013Actual season year • SRS range -1.3 to 7.32019
Active comparison point
Matt Luke • 2019
2019 Ole Miss
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-8 • SRS 6.5 • SP Overall 2.9
Win %
33.3%
YoY SRS
+3.0
SP Off / Def
28.6 / 23.8
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Kliff Kingsbury
Nearest year 2018 • Texas Tech
5-7 • SRS 7.3 • SP Overall 8.7
Matt Luke trails by a 0.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -7.6 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Luke | |||||
| Ole Miss | 2017-2019 | 3 | 15-21 | 3.9 | 6.5 |
| Kliff Kingsbury | |||||
| Texas Tech | 2013-2018 | 6 | 35-40 | 4.0 | 7.3Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Matt Luke
15-21 • 41.7% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
97th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Ole Miss 2019
SRS 6.5
Worst Season
Ole Miss 2017
SRS 1.6
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 2019
3.0 SRS
Longer run
Full profile →Kliff Kingsbury
35-40 • 46.7% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
6 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Texas Tech 2018
SRS 7.3
Worst Season
Texas Tech 2014
SRS -1.3
Biggest Improvement
Texas Tech 2015
6.5 SRS