Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Michael Desormeaux vs Homer Hazel
Michael Desormeaux: 44th pct vs Homer Hazel: 42nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Michael Desormeaux vs Homer Hazel
Michael Desormeaux: 44th pct vs Homer Hazel: 42nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Homer Hazel vs Michael Desormeaux
Homer Hazel: 51st pct vs Michael Desormeaux: 50th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Homer Hazel
Homer Hazel: 74th pct vs Michael Desormeaux: 65th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Homer Hazel vs Michael Desormeaux
Homer Hazel: 0 titles vs Michael Desormeaux: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Homer Hazel vs Michael Desormeaux
Homer Hazel: 5 seasons vs Michael Desormeaux: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Michael Desormeaux
Michael Desormeaux: 56.1% vs Homer Hazel: 48.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Michael Desormeaux sets the reference point in overall strength.
Michael Desormeaux sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Homer Hazel
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Michael Desormeaux
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 1.2
61th pct
Above average
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
5-4 • SRS 6.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
55.6%
YoY SRS
+6.6
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Michael Desormeaux
Nearest year 2021 • Louisiana
1-0 • SRS 5.7 • SP Overall 8.7
Homer Hazel holds a 0.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homer Hazel | |||||
| Ole Miss | 1925-1929 | 5 | 21-22-3 | -2.4 | 6.2 |
| Michael Desormeaux | |||||
| Louisiana | 2021-2025 | 5 | 23-18 | -3.0 | 5.7 |
Closing takeaway
21-22-3 • 48.9% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
74th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Ole Miss 1928
SRS 6.2
Worst Season
Ole Miss 1929
SRS -7.6
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1928
6.6 SRS
23-18 • 56.1% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Louisiana 2021
SRS 5.7
Worst Season
Louisiana 2025
SRS -11.6
Biggest Improvement
Louisiana 2024
4.2 SRS