Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Fisher DeBerry
Fisher DeBerry: 75th pct vs David Cutcliffe: 49th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
David CutcliffeFisher DeBerry
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Fisher DeBerry
Fisher DeBerry: 87th pct vs David Cutcliffe: 65th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: David Cutcliffe
David Cutcliffe: 51st pct vs Fisher DeBerry: 44th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: David Cutcliffe vs Fisher DeBerry
David Cutcliffe: 0 titles vs Fisher DeBerry: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: David Cutcliffe vs Fisher DeBerry
David Cutcliffe: 24 seasons vs Fisher DeBerry: 23 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Fisher DeBerry
Fisher DeBerry: 60.8% vs David Cutcliffe: 49.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Fisher DeBerry has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeFisher DeBerry has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
David Cutcliffe
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 0.2
58th pct
Above average
Fisher DeBerry
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.8
69th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
David CutcliffeFisher DeBerry
EliteStrongAverageLean
David Cutcliffe: 2008 Duke
1984Actual season year • SRS range -15.6 to 21.02021
Active comparison point
David Cutcliffe • 2003
2003 Ole Miss
Best season10-3 • SRS 11.3 • SP Overall 14.5
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+7.4
SP Off / Def
40.1 / 28.1
Finish
#13
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fisher DeBerry
Nearest year 2003 • Air Force
7-5 • SRS 1.2 • SP Overall 2.1
David Cutcliffe holds a 10.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +10.8 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Cutcliffe | |||||
| Ole Miss | 1998-2004 | 7 | 44-29 | 4.4Best quality | 11.3 |
| Duke | 2008-2021 | 14 | 77-97 | -0.6 | 8.3 |
| Fisher DeBerry | |||||
| Air Force | 1984-2006 | 23 | 169-109-1 | 2.7 | 21.0Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →David Cutcliffe
121-126 • 49.0% • 21 seasons • 0 titles
51st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Ole Miss 2003
SRS 11.3
Worst Season
Duke 2021
SRS -15.6
Biggest Improvement
Duke 2013
11.6 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Fisher DeBerry
169-109-1 • 60.8% • 23 seasons • 0 titles
75th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Air Force 1985
SRS 21.0
Worst Season
Air Force 1993
SRS -11.2
Biggest Improvement
Air Force 1994
17.2 SRS