Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Gene Chizik vs Mark Mangino
Gene Chizik: 70th pct vs Mark Mangino: 69th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gene ChizikMark Mangino
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Gene Chizik
Gene Chizik: 91st pct vs Mark Mangino: 85th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Mark Mangino
Mark Mangino: 10th pct vs Gene Chizik: 6th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Gene Chizik
Gene Chizik: 1 title vs Mark Mangino: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Mark Mangino
Mark Mangino: 8 seasons vs Gene Chizik: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Mark Mangino vs Gene Chizik
Mark Mangino: 51.0% vs Gene Chizik: 50.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Gene Chizik and Mark Mangino look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarGene Chizik and Mark Mangino look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gene Chizik
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 7.6
79th pct
Strong
Mark Mangino
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 6.0
75th pct
Strong
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gene ChizikMark Mangino
EliteStrongAverageLean
Gene Chizik: 2009 Auburn
2002Actual season year • SRS range -19.4 to 23.92012
Active comparison point
Gene Chizik • 2010
2010 Auburn
Best season14-0 • SRS 23.9 • SP Overall 26.5
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+13.2
SP Off / Def
49.4 / 22.7
Finish
#1
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mark Mangino
Nearest year 2009 • Kansas
5-7 • SRS 2.1 • SP Overall 8.0
Gene Chizik holds a 21.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +16.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene Chizik | |||||
| Iowa State | 2007-2008 | 2 | 5-19 | -8.4 | -6.6 |
| Auburn | 2009-2012 | 4 | 33-19 | 8.6Best quality | 23.9Highest peak |
| Mark Mangino | |||||
| Kansas | 2002-2009 | 8 | 50-48 | 2.4 | 20.5Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Gene Chizik
38-38 • 50.0% • 6 seasons • 1 title
-10.2 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Auburn 2010
SRS 23.9
Worst Season
Iowa State 2008
SRS -10.2
Biggest Improvement
Auburn 2009
20.9 SRS
Longer run
Full profile →Mark Mangino
50-48 • 51.0% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
8 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Kansas 2007
SRS 20.5
Worst Season
Kansas 2002
SRS -19.4
Biggest Improvement
Kansas 2007
20.1 SRS