Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Philip Montgomery vs Bob Stull
Philip Montgomery: 38th pct vs Bob Stull: 35th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Philip Montgomery vs Bob Stull
Philip Montgomery: 38th pct vs Bob Stull: 35th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Philip Montgomery
Philip Montgomery: 50th pct vs Bob Stull: 47th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Philip Montgomery vs Bob Stull
Philip Montgomery: 69th pct vs Bob Stull: 68th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bob Stull vs Philip Montgomery
Bob Stull: 0 titles vs Philip Montgomery: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bob Stull vs Philip Montgomery
Bob Stull: 8 seasons vs Philip Montgomery: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Philip Montgomery
Philip Montgomery: 44.8% vs Bob Stull: 40.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Philip Montgomery and Bob Stull look similar in overall strength.
Philip Montgomery and Bob Stull look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Bob Stull
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -4.0
44th pct
Mixed
Philip Montgomery
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -3.7
45th pct
Mixed
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-3 • SRS 4.8 • SP Overall 8.8
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+9.0
SP Off / Def
37.7 / 30.9
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Philip Montgomery
Nearest year 2015 • Tulsa
6-7 • SRS -5.3 • SP Overall -8.5
Bob Stull holds a 10.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +5.3 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Stull | |||||
| UTEP | 1986-1988 | 3 | 21-15 | -3.2 | 4.8 |
| Missouri | 1989-1993 | 5 | 15-38-2 | -4.0 | 0.4 |
| Philip Montgomery | |||||
| Tulsa | 2015-2022 | 8 | 43-53 | -3.7 | 5.9Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
36-53-2 • 40.7% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
UTEP 1988
SRS 4.8
Worst Season
Missouri 1989
SRS -13.2
Biggest Improvement
Missouri 1990
13.6 SRS
43-53 • 44.8% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Tulsa 2016
SRS 5.9
Worst Season
Tulsa 2018
SRS -12.0
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 2019
11.9 SRS