Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Francis Schmidt vs Hugo Bezdek
Francis Schmidt: 74th pct vs Hugo Bezdek: 73rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Francis SchmidtHugo Bezdek
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Hugo Bezdek vs Francis Schmidt
Hugo Bezdek: 96th pct vs Francis Schmidt: 93rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Francis Schmidt vs Hugo Bezdek
Francis Schmidt: 6th pct vs Hugo Bezdek: 5th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Francis Schmidt vs Hugo Bezdek
Francis Schmidt: 0 titles vs Hugo Bezdek: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Hugo Bezdek vs Francis Schmidt
Hugo Bezdek: 22 seasons vs Francis Schmidt: 21 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Francis Schmidt
Francis Schmidt: 70.8% vs Hugo Bezdek: 68.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Francis Schmidt
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Hugo Bezdek
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Francis SchmidtHugo Bezdek
EliteStrongAverageLean
Francis Schmidt: 1929 TCUFrancis Schmidt: 1934 Ohio StateFrancis Schmidt: 1941 IdahoHugo Bezdek: 1916 OregonHugo Bezdek: 1918 Penn State
1908Actual season year • SRS range -18.8 to 28.31942
Active comparison point
Francis Schmidt • 1929
1929 TCU
Best seasonBiggest improvementNew stop: TCU9-0-1 • SRS 25.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
95.0%
YoY SRS
+21.8
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Hugo Bezdek
Nearest year 1929 • Penn State
6-3 • SRS 7.9 • SP Overall —
Francis Schmidt holds a 17.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francis Schmidt | |||||
| Arkansas | 1922-1928 | 7 | 42-20-3 | 2.3 | 12.8 |
| TCU | 1929-1933 | 5 | 47-5-5 | 14.9 | 25.1 |
| Ohio State | 1934-1940 | 7 | 39-16-1 | 16.2Best quality | 24.2 |
| Idaho | 1941-1942 | 2 | 7-12 | -15.7 | -12.5 |
| Hugo Bezdek | |||||
| Arkansas | 1908-1912 | 5 | 29-13-1 | 0.9 | 15.8 |
| Oregon | 1916-1917 | 2 | 11-3-1 | 4.3 | 22.1 |
| Penn State | 1918-1929 | 12 | 65-30-11 | 11.7 | 28.3Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Francis Schmidt
135-53-9 • 70.8% • 21 seasons • 0 titles
4 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
TCU 1929
SRS 25.1
Worst Season
Idaho 1942
SRS -18.8
Biggest Improvement
TCU 1929
21.8 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Hugo Bezdek
105-46-13 • 68.0% • 19 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Penn State 1919
SRS 28.3
Worst Season
Arkansas 1908
SRS -17.1
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas 1909
32.9 SRS