Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: John McLean
John McLean: 25th pct vs Todd Monken: 21st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
John McLeanTodd Monken
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: John McLean
John McLean: 47th pct vs Todd Monken: 39th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: John McLean vs Todd Monken
John McLean: 6th pct vs Todd Monken: 5th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: John McLean vs Todd Monken
John McLean: 0 titles vs Todd Monken: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: John McLean vs Todd Monken
John McLean: 3 seasons vs Todd Monken: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: John McLean vs Todd Monken
John McLean: 35.2% vs Todd Monken: 34.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Todd Monken sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTodd Monken sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John McLean
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Todd Monken
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.0
19th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
John McLeanTodd Monken
EliteStrongAverageLean
1903Actual season year • SRS range -27.9 to 4.82015
Active comparison point
John McLean • 1905
1905 Missouri
Best seasonBiggest improvement5-4 • SRS 4.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
55.6%
YoY SRS
+27.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Todd Monken
Nearest year 2013 • Southern Miss
1-11 • SRS -27.9 • SP Overall -24.5
John McLean holds a 32.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McLean | |||||
| Missouri | 1903-1905 | 3 | 9-17-1 | -11.0Best quality | 4.8Highest peak |
| Todd Monken | |||||
| Southern Miss | 2013-2015 | 3 | 13-25 | -13.3 | 1.8 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →John McLean
9-17-1 • 35.2% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
4.8 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Missouri 1905
SRS 4.8
Worst Season
Missouri 1904
SRS -22.2
Biggest Improvement
Missouri 1905
27.0 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Todd Monken
13-25 • 34.2% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Southern Miss 2015
SRS 1.8
Worst Season
Southern Miss 2013
SRS -27.9
Biggest Improvement
Southern Miss 2015
15.7 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.