Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Everett Faunce
Everett Faunce: 16th pct vs Frank Carideo: 11th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Frank CarideoEverett Faunce
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Frank Carideo vs Everett Faunce
Frank Carideo: 15th pct vs Everett Faunce: 14th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Everett Faunce vs Frank Carideo
Everett Faunce: 94th pct vs Frank Carideo: 94th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Everett Faunce vs Frank Carideo
Everett Faunce: 0 titles vs Frank Carideo: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Everett Faunce vs Frank Carideo
Everett Faunce: 4 seasons vs Frank Carideo: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Everett Faunce
Everett Faunce: 38.8% vs Frank Carideo: 11.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frank Carideo
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Everett Faunce
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Frank CarideoEverett Faunce
EliteStrongAverageLean
1932Actual season year • SRS range -18.5 to -10.71958
Active comparison point
Frank Carideo • 1932
1932 Missouri
Best season1-7-1 • SRS -10.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
16.7%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Everett Faunce
Nearest year 1955 • Utah State
4-6 • SRS -11.1 • SP Overall —
Frank Carideo holds a 0.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Carideo | |||||
| Missouri | 1932-1934 | 3 | 2-23-2 | -14.0 | -10.7 |
| Everett Faunce | |||||
| Utah State | 1955-1958 | 4 | 15-24-1 | -14.5 | -11.1 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Frank Carideo
2-23-2 • 11.1% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Missouri 1932
SRS -10.7
Worst Season
Missouri 1933
SRS -17.3
Biggest Improvement
Missouri 1934
3.3 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Everett Faunce
15-24-1 • 38.8% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
16th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Utah State 1955
SRS -11.1
Worst Season
Utah State 1957
SRS -18.5
Biggest Improvement
Utah State 1958
4.0 SRS