Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Murray Warmath
Murray Warmath: 82nd pct vs George Hauser: 67th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Murray WarmathGeorge Hauser
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Murray Warmath
Murray Warmath: 90th pct vs George Hauser: 74th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Murray Warmath vs George Hauser
Murray Warmath: 52nd pct vs George Hauser: 50th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Murray Warmath
Murray Warmath: 1 title vs George Hauser: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Murray Warmath vs George Hauser
Murray Warmath: 20 seasons vs George Hauser: 19 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: George Hauser
George Hauser: 60.0% vs Murray Warmath: 53.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Murray Warmath sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMurray Warmath sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Murray Warmath
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -1.2
52th pct
Mixed
George Hauser
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Murray WarmathGeorge Hauser
EliteStrongAverageLean
Murray Warmath: 1954 MinnesotaGeorge Hauser: 1942 Minnesota
1926Actual season year • SRS range -2.7 to 22.91971
Active comparison point
Murray Warmath • 1960
1960 Minnesota
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-2 • SRS 22.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+19.6
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#1
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George Hauser
Nearest year 1944 • Minnesota
5-3-1 • SRS 14.9 • SP Overall —
Murray Warmath holds a 8.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murray Warmath | |||||
| Mississippi State | 1952-1953 | 2 | 10-6-3 | 15.2Best quality | 15.6 |
| Minnesota | 1954-1971 | 18 | 87-78-7 | 10.0 | 22.9Highest peak |
| George Hauser | |||||
| Colgate | 1926-1927 | 2 | 9-4-5 | 6.2 | 15.0 |
| Minnesota | 1942-1944 | 3 | 15-11-1 | 11.0 | 14.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Murray Warmath
97-84-10 • 53.4% • 20 seasons • 1 title
22.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Minnesota 1960
SRS 22.9
Worst Season
Minnesota 1966
SRS -2.5
Biggest Improvement
Minnesota 1960
19.6 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →George Hauser
24-15-6 • 60.0% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Colgate 1926
SRS 15.0
Worst Season
Colgate 1927
SRS -2.7
Biggest Improvement
Minnesota 1942
14.8 SRS