Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Jim WackerJoe Lee Dunn

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Jim Wacker

Jim Wacker: 35th pct vs Joe Lee Dunn: 31st pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Clear edge

Edge: Jim Wacker

Jim Wacker: 49th pct vs Joe Lee Dunn: 41st pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Joe Lee Dunn vs Jim Wacker

Joe Lee Dunn: 63rd pct vs Jim Wacker: 61st pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Jim Wacker vs Joe Lee Dunn

Jim Wacker: 0 titles vs Joe Lee Dunn: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Narrow edge

Edge: Jim Wacker

Jim Wacker: 14 seasons vs Joe Lee Dunn: 12 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Similar

Similar: Jim Wacker vs Joe Lee Dunn

Jim Wacker: 36.8% vs Joe Lee Dunn: 36.2%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Joe Lee Dunn and Jim Wacker look similar in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Similar

Joe Lee Dunn and Jim Wacker look similar in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Jim Wacker

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -5.2

41th pct

Mixed

Joe Lee Dunn

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -5.1

42th pct

Mixed

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Jim WackerJoe Lee Dunn
EliteStrongAverageLean
Jim Wacker: 1992 MinnesotaJoe Lee Dunn: 1994 Ole Miss
1983Actual season year • SRS range -17.8 to 5.61996

Active comparison point

Jim Wacker1987

Selected

1987 TCU

Best seasonBiggest improvement

5-6 • SRS 5.6 • SP Overall 8.3

Win %

45.5%

YoY SRS

+16.4

SP Off / Def

31.2 / 24.7

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Joe Lee Dunn

Nearest year 1986New Mexico

Profile

4-8 • SRS -5.8 • SP Overall -7.6

Jim Wacker holds a 11.4-point SRS edge at this point.

Offense gap: +1.1 SP offense

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Jim Wacker
TCU1983-1991940-58-2-4.45.6Highest peak
Minnesota1992-1996516-39-1.72.6
Joe Lee Dunn
New Mexico1983-1986417-30-7.10.1
Ole Miss1994-199414-72.8Best quality2.8

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Higher ceiling

Jim Wacker

56-97-236.8%14 seasons • 0 titles

5.6 peak SRS at the top end.

Full profile →

Best Season

TCU 1987

SRS 5.6

Worst Season

TCU 1985

SRS -17.8

Biggest Improvement

TCU 1987

16.4 SRS

Better floor

Joe Lee Dunn

21-3736.2%5 seasons • 0 titles

-12.6 worst-season SRS.

Full profile →

Best Season

Ole Miss 1994

SRS 2.8

Worst Season

New Mexico 1984

SRS -12.6

Biggest Improvement

Ole Miss 1994

8.6 SRS