Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Alexander Jerrems
Alexander Jerrems: 22nd pct vs Stanley Cofall: 6th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Alexander JerremsStanley Cofall
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Alexander Jerrems vs Stanley Cofall
Alexander Jerrems: 2nd pct vs Stanley Cofall: 2nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Alexander Jerrems vs Stanley Cofall
Alexander Jerrems: 0 titles vs Stanley Cofall: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Alexander Jerrems vs Stanley Cofall
Alexander Jerrems: 2 seasons vs Stanley Cofall: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Alexander Jerrems
Alexander Jerrems: 66.7% vs Stanley Cofall: 30.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Alexander Jerrems
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Stanley Cofall
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Alexander JerremsStanley Cofall
EliteStrongAverageLean
1896Actual season year • SRS range -25.5 to -23.51928
Active comparison point
Alexander Jerrems • 1897
1897 Minnesota
Best seasonWorst season4-4 • SRS -24.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Stanley Cofall
Nearest year 1928 • Wake Forest
2-6-2 • SRS -24.5 • SP Overall —
Alexander Jerrems holds a 0.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Jerrems | |||||
| Minnesota | 1896-1897 | 2 | 12-6 | -24.5 | -24.5 |
| Stanley Cofall | |||||
| Wake Forest | 1928-1928 | 1 | 2-6-2 | -24.5 | -24.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Alexander Jerrems
12-6 • 66.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
22nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Minnesota 1897
SRS -24.5
Worst Season
Minnesota 1897
SRS -24.5
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Stanley Cofall
2-6-2 • 30.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Wake Forest 1928
SRS -24.5
Worst Season
Wake Forest 1928
SRS -24.5
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—