Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: ET Pickering
ET Pickering: 26th pct vs JD DePree: 12th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
ET PickeringJD DePree
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: ET Pickering vs JD DePree
ET Pickering: 16th pct vs JD DePree: 15th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: ET Pickering vs JD DePree
ET Pickering: 0 titles vs JD DePree: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: ET Pickering vs JD DePree
ET Pickering: 2 seasons vs JD DePree: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: ET Pickering
ET Pickering: 61.1% vs JD DePree: 30.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
ET Pickering
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
JD DePree
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
ET PickeringJD DePree
EliteStrongAverageLean
1905Actual season year • SRS range -23.8 to -9.71914
Active comparison point
ET Pickering • 1913
1913 Arkansas
Best season7-2 • SRS -9.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
77.8%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
JD DePree
Nearest year 1906 • Tennessee
1-6-2 • SRS -23.6 • SP Overall —
ET Pickering holds a 13.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET Pickering | |||||
| Arkansas | 1913-1914 | 2 | 11-7 | -16.8 | -9.7 |
| JD DePree | |||||
| Tennessee | 1905-1906 | 2 | 4-11-3 | -16.9 | -10.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →ET Pickering
11-7 • 61.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
26th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Arkansas 1913
SRS -9.7
Worst Season
Arkansas 1914
SRS -23.8
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas 1914
-14.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →JD DePree
4-11-3 • 30.6% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Tennessee 1905
SRS -10.3
Worst Season
Tennessee 1906
SRS -23.6
Biggest Improvement
Tennessee 1906
-13.3 SRS