Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Curley Byrd
Curley Byrd: 43rd pct vs Tim Brewster: 29th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Tim BrewsterCurley Byrd
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: Curley Byrd
Curley Byrd: 56th pct vs Tim Brewster: 36th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Tim Brewster
Tim Brewster: 74th pct vs Curley Byrd: 69th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Curley Byrd vs Tim Brewster
Curley Byrd: 0 titles vs Tim Brewster: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Curley Byrd vs Tim Brewster
Curley Byrd: 18 seasons vs Tim Brewster: 18 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Curley Byrd
Curley Byrd: 55.2% vs Tim Brewster: 36.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tim Brewster sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTim Brewster sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tim Brewster
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -6.0
39th pct
Lower end
Curley Byrd
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Tim BrewsterCurley Byrd
EliteStrongAverageLean
Tim Brewster: 2024 Charlotte
1917Actual season year • SRS range -13.8 to 7.82024
Active comparison point
Tim Brewster • 2008
2008 Minnesota
Best seasonBiggest improvement7-6 • SRS 0.4 • SP Overall 3.0
Win %
53.8%
YoY SRS
+9.7
SP Off / Def
26.8 / 25.0
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Curley Byrd
Nearest year 1934 • Maryland
7-3 • SRS 3.4 • SP Overall —
Tim Brewster trails by a 3.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Brewster | |||||
| Minnesota | 2007-2010 | 4 | 15-30 | -3.4 | 0.4 |
| Charlotte | 2024-2024 | 1 | 2-0 | -12.4 | -12.4 |
| Curley Byrd | |||||
| Maryland | 1917-1934 | 18 | 88-70-14 | -4.3 | 7.8Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Tim Brewster
17-30 • 36.2% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
74th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Minnesota 2008
SRS 0.4
Worst Season
Charlotte 2024
SRS -12.4
Biggest Improvement
Minnesota 2008
9.7 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Curley Byrd
88-70-14 • 55.2% • 18 seasons • 0 titles
7.8 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Maryland 1923
SRS 7.8
Worst Season
Maryland 1932
SRS -13.8
Biggest Improvement
Maryland 1934
15.6 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.