Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Tad WiemanLon Stiner

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Lon Stiner

Lon Stiner: 60th pct vs Tad Wieman: 54th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Narrow edge

Edge: Lon Stiner

Lon Stiner: 74th pct vs Tad Wieman: 68th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Narrow edge

Edge: Lon Stiner

Lon Stiner: 62nd pct vs Tad Wieman: 55th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Lon Stiner vs Tad Wieman

Lon Stiner: 0 titles vs Tad Wieman: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Lon Stiner vs Tad Wieman

Lon Stiner: 16 seasons vs Tad Wieman: 16 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Clear edge

Edge: Lon Stiner

Lon Stiner: 58.9% vs Tad Wieman: 54.4%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Tad Wieman

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Lon Stiner

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Tad WiemanLon Stiner
EliteStrongAverageLean
Tad Wieman: 1938 Princeton
1927Actual season year • SRS range -9.0 to 15.01948

Active comparison point

Tad Wieman1927

Selected

1927 Michigan

Best season

6-2 • SRS 12.9 • SP Overall

Win %

75.0%

YoY SRS

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Lon Stiner

Nearest year 1933Oregon State

Profile

6-2-2 • SRS 11.2 • SP Overall

Tad Wieman holds a 1.7-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Tad Wieman
Michigan1927-192829-6-18.7Best quality12.9
Princeton1938-1942520-18-3-0.46.2
Lon Stiner
Oregon State1933-19481474-49-173.215.0Highest peak

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Broader school footprint

Tad Wieman

29-24-454.4%7 seasons • 0 titles

2 schools across the tracked career.

Full profile →

Best Season

Michigan 1927

SRS 12.9

Worst Season

Princeton 1941

SRS -9.0

Biggest Improvement

Princeton 1942

8.4 SRS

Steadier arc

Lon Stiner

74-49-1758.9%14 seasons • 0 titles

62nd pct steadiness score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Oregon State 1941

SRS 15.0

Worst Season

Oregon State 1945

SRS -8.4

Biggest Improvement

Oregon State 1946

12.8 SRS