Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: James Halligan
James Halligan: 55th pct vs Billy Hayes: 39th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
James HalliganBilly Hayes
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: James Halligan vs Billy Hayes
James Halligan: 44th pct vs Billy Hayes: 44th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: James Halligan vs Billy Hayes
James Halligan: 97th pct vs Billy Hayes: 97th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Billy Hayes vs James Halligan
Billy Hayes: 0 titles vs James Halligan: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Billy Hayes vs James Halligan
Billy Hayes: 3 seasons vs James Halligan: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: James Halligan
James Halligan: 64.0% vs Billy Hayes: 33.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
James Halligan
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Billy Hayes
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
James HalliganBilly Hayes
EliteStrongAverageLean
1901Actual season year • SRS range -0.4 to 4.01933
Active comparison point
James Halligan • 1901
1901 Massachusetts
Best season8-1 • SRS 4.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
88.9%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Billy Hayes
Nearest year 1931 • Indiana
2-5-1 • SRS 2.4 • SP Overall —
James Halligan holds a 1.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Halligan | |||||
| Massachusetts | 1901-1903 | 3 | 15-8-2 | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Billy Hayes | |||||
| Indiana | 1931-1933 | 3 | 6-14-4 | 1.9 | 3.8 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →James Halligan
15-8-2 • 64.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
55th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Massachusetts 1901
SRS 4.0
Worst Season
Massachusetts 1903
SRS 0.1
Biggest Improvement
Massachusetts 1902
-0.5 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Billy Hayes
6-14-4 • 33.3% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Indiana 1932
SRS 3.8
Worst Season
Indiana 1933
SRS -0.4
Biggest Improvement
Indiana 1932
1.4 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.