Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Leo DeTray
Leo DeTray: 28th pct vs John Dunlop: 12th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
John DunlopLeo DeTray
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: John Dunlop vs Leo DeTray
John Dunlop: 12th pct vs Leo DeTray: 12th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: John Dunlop vs Leo DeTray
John Dunlop: 0 titles vs Leo DeTray: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: John Dunlop vs Leo DeTray
John Dunlop: 1 seasons vs Leo DeTray: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Leo DeTray
Leo DeTray: 57.1% vs John Dunlop: 11.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John Dunlop
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Leo DeTray
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
John DunlopLeo DeTray
EliteStrongAverageLean
1901Actual season year • SRS range -12.9 to -10.91912
Active comparison point
John Dunlop • 1901
1901 Boston College
Best seasonWorst season1-8 • SRS -11.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
11.1%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Leo DeTray
Nearest year 1912 • Ole Miss
4-3 • SRS -11.9 • SP Overall —
John Dunlop holds a 0.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Dunlop | |||||
| Boston College | 1901-1901 | 1 | 1-8 | -11.9 | -11.9 |
| Leo DeTray | |||||
| Ole Miss | 1912-1912 | 1 | 4-3 | -11.9 | -11.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →John Dunlop
1-8 • 11.1% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Boston College 1901
SRS -11.9
Worst Season
Boston College 1901
SRS -11.9
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Higher career quality
Full profile →Leo DeTray
4-3 • 57.1% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
28th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Ole Miss 1912
SRS -11.9
Worst Season
Ole Miss 1912
SRS -11.9
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.