Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: ET Pickering vs TT McConnell
ET Pickering: 26th pct vs TT McConnell: 24th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
TT McConnellET Pickering
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: TT McConnell vs ET Pickering
TT McConnell: 17th pct vs ET Pickering: 16th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: ET Pickering vs TT McConnell
ET Pickering: 0 titles vs TT McConnell: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: ET Pickering vs TT McConnell
ET Pickering: 2 seasons vs TT McConnell: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: ET Pickering
ET Pickering: 61.1% vs TT McConnell: 56.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
TT McConnell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
ET Pickering
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
TT McConnellET Pickering
EliteStrongAverageLean
1913Actual season year • SRS range -23.8 to -8.71916
Active comparison point
TT McConnell • 1915
1915 Arkansas
Best season4-2-1 • SRS -8.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
64.3%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
ET Pickering
Nearest year 1914 • Arkansas
4-5 • SRS -23.8 • SP Overall —
TT McConnell holds a 15.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT McConnell | |||||
| Arkansas | 1915-1916 | 2 | 8-6-1 | -15.8 | -8.7 |
| ET Pickering | |||||
| Arkansas | 1913-1914 | 2 | 11-7 | -16.8 | -9.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →TT McConnell
8-6-1 • 56.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Arkansas 1915
SRS -8.7
Worst Season
Arkansas 1916
SRS -22.8
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas 1916
-14.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →ET Pickering
11-7 • 61.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Arkansas 1913
SRS -9.7
Worst Season
Arkansas 1914
SRS -23.8
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas 1914
-14.1 SRS