Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Jeff Cravath
Jeff Cravath: 78th pct vs Gilmour Dobie: 73rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gilmour DobieJeff Cravath
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Gilmour Dobie
Gilmour Dobie: 97th pct vs Jeff Cravath: 85th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Cravath vs Gilmour Dobie
Jeff Cravath: 2nd pct vs Gilmour Dobie: 2nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Gilmour Dobie vs Jeff Cravath
Gilmour Dobie: 0 titles vs Jeff Cravath: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Gilmour Dobie vs Jeff Cravath
Gilmour Dobie: 23 seasons vs Jeff Cravath: 22 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Gilmour Dobie
Gilmour Dobie: 70.9% vs Jeff Cravath: 62.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gilmour Dobie
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Jeff Cravath
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gilmour DobieJeff Cravath
EliteStrongAverageLean
Gilmour Dobie: 1917 NavyGilmour Dobie: 1920 CornellGilmour Dobie: 1937 Boston CollegeJeff Cravath: 1941 San FranciscoJeff Cravath: 1942 USC
1916Actual season year • SRS range -22.6 to 29.81950
Active comparison point
Gilmour Dobie • 1923
1923 Cornell
Best season8-0 • SRS 29.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+3.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jeff Cravath
Nearest year 1929 • Denver
5-1-1 • SRS -22.6 • SP Overall —
Gilmour Dobie holds a 52.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilmour Dobie | |||||
| Washington | 1916-1916 | 1 | 6-0-1 | 17.0 | 17.0 |
| Navy | 1917-1919 | 3 | 17-3 | 24.7Best quality | 27.4 |
| Cornell | 1920-1935 | 16 | 82-36-7 | 3.8 | 29.8Highest peak |
| Boston College | 1937-1938 | 2 | 10-5-3 | 2.8 | 6.6 |
| Jeff Cravath | |||||
| Denver | 1929-1931 | 3 | 14-11-1 | -15.5 | -5.4 |
| San Francisco | 1941-1941 | 1 | 6-4 | -7.0 | -7.0 |
| USC | 1942-1950 | 9 | 54-28-8 | 11.6 | 20.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Gilmour Dobie
115-44-11 • 70.9% • 22 seasons • 0 titles
29.8 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Cornell 1923
SRS 29.8
Worst Season
Cornell 1928
SRS -20.6
Biggest Improvement
Cornell 1929
21.3 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Jeff Cravath
74-43-9 • 62.3% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
78th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
USC 1947
SRS 20.2
Worst Season
Denver 1929
SRS -22.6
Biggest Improvement
Denver 1930
17.2 SRS