Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: ET McDonald
ET McDonald: 29th pct vs Bob Deming: 19th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
ET McDonaldBob Deming
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Bob Deming vs ET McDonald
Bob Deming: 29th pct vs ET McDonald: 29th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bob Deming vs ET McDonald
Bob Deming: 0 titles vs ET McDonald: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bob Deming vs ET McDonald
Bob Deming: 2 seasons vs ET McDonald: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: ET McDonald
ET McDonald: 61.8% vs Bob Deming: 40.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Bob Deming sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeBob Deming sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
ET McDonald
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Bob Deming
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -22.0
5th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
ET McDonaldBob Deming
EliteStrongAverageLean
1914Actual season year • SRS range -29.9 to -2.71970
Active comparison point
ET McDonald • 1915
1915 LSU
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest drop6-2 • SRS -2.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
+27.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Bob Deming
Nearest year 1969 • Buffalo
6-3 • SRS -2.7 • SP Overall —
ET McDonald trails by a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET McDonald | |||||
| LSU | 1914-1915 | 2 | 10-6-1 | -16.4 | -2.8 |
| Bob Deming | |||||
| Buffalo | 1969-1970 | 2 | 8-12 | -14.9Best quality | -2.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →ET McDonald
10-6-1 • 61.8% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
29th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
LSU 1915
SRS -2.8
Worst Season
LSU 1914
SRS -29.9
Biggest Improvement
LSU 1915
27.1 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Bob Deming
8-12 • 40.0% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
-27.1 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Buffalo 1969
SRS -2.7
Worst Season
Buffalo 1970
SRS -27.1
Biggest Improvement
Buffalo 1970
-24.4 SRS