Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: William Glassford vs AD Kirwan
William Glassford: 44th pct vs AD Kirwan: 44th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
AD KirwanWilliam Glassford
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: AD Kirwan vs William Glassford
AD Kirwan: 55th pct vs William Glassford: 54th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: AD Kirwan
AD Kirwan: 74th pct vs William Glassford: 69th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: AD Kirwan vs William Glassford
AD Kirwan: 0 titles vs William Glassford: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: AD Kirwan vs William Glassford
AD Kirwan: 7 seasons vs William Glassford: 7 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: AD Kirwan vs William Glassford
AD Kirwan: 46.4% vs William Glassford: 46.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
AD Kirwan
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
William Glassford
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
AD KirwanWilliam Glassford
EliteStrongAverageLean
1938Actual season year • SRS range -10.9 to 7.41955
Active comparison point
AD Kirwan • 1939
1939 Kentucky
Best seasonBiggest improvement6-2-1 • SRS 7.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.2%
YoY SRS
+14.8
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
William Glassford
Nearest year 1949 • Nebraska
4-5 • SRS -0.2 • SP Overall —
AD Kirwan holds a 7.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD Kirwan | |||||
| Kentucky | 1938-1944 | 6 | 24-28-4 | -0.1 | 7.4 |
| William Glassford | |||||
| Nebraska | 1949-1955 | 7 | 30-35-4 | 0.3 | 6.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →AD Kirwan
24-28-4 • 46.4% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
74th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Kentucky 1939
SRS 7.4
Worst Season
Kentucky 1938
SRS -7.4
Biggest Improvement
Kentucky 1939
14.8 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →William Glassford
30-35-4 • 46.4% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Nebraska 1950
SRS 6.9
Worst Season
Nebraska 1951
SRS -10.9
Biggest Improvement
Nebraska 1952
16.6 SRS