Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Patrick ODea vs Pat Dwyer
Patrick ODea: 46th pct vs Pat Dwyer: 44th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Patrick ODeaPat Dwyer
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Patrick ODea vs Pat Dwyer
Patrick ODea: 29th pct vs Pat Dwyer: 27th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Patrick ODea vs Pat Dwyer
Patrick ODea: 99th pct vs Pat Dwyer: 98th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Pat Dwyer vs Patrick ODea
Pat Dwyer: 0 titles vs Patrick ODea: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Pat Dwyer vs Patrick ODea
Pat Dwyer: 3 seasons vs Patrick ODea: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Patrick ODea
Patrick ODea: 71.4% vs Pat Dwyer: 68.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Patrick ODea
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Pat Dwyer
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Patrick ODeaPat Dwyer
EliteStrongAverageLean
Patrick ODea: 1902 Missouri
1900Actual season year • SRS range -6.5 to -2.71913
Active comparison point
Patrick ODea • 1902
1902 Missouri
Best seasonBiggest improvementNew stop: Missouri5-3 • SRS -2.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
62.5%
YoY SRS
+2.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Pat Dwyer
Nearest year 1911 • LSU
6-3 • SRS -3.4 • SP Overall —
Patrick ODea holds a 0.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick ODea | |||||
| Notre Dame | 1900-1901 | 2 | 14-4-2 | -4.5 | -4.2 |
| Missouri | 1902-1902 | 1 | 5-3 | -2.7Best quality | -2.7 |
| Pat Dwyer | |||||
| LSU | 1911-1913 | 3 | 16-7-2 | -4.6 | -3.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Patrick ODea
19-7-2 • 71.4% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Missouri 1902
SRS -2.7
Worst Season
Notre Dame 1901
SRS -4.8
Biggest Improvement
Missouri 1902
2.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Pat Dwyer
16-7-2 • 68.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
LSU 1911
SRS -3.4
Worst Season
LSU 1912
SRS -6.5
Biggest Improvement
LSU 1913
2.7 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.