Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Charles Best vs James McWeeney
Charles Best: 56th pct vs James McWeeney: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
James McWeeneyCharles Best
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Charles Best vs James McWeeney
Charles Best: 39th pct vs James McWeeney: 39th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charles Best vs James McWeeney
Charles Best: 0 titles vs James McWeeney: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Charles Best vs James McWeeney
Charles Best: 1 seasons vs James McWeeney: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Charles Best
Charles Best: 75.0% vs James McWeeney: 65.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
James McWeeney
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Charles Best
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
James McWeeneyCharles Best
EliteStrongAverageLean
1899Actual season year • SRS range 0.5 to 2.51902
Active comparison point
James McWeeney • 1899
1899 Notre Dame
Best seasonWorst season6-3-1 • SRS 1.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
65.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Charles Best
Nearest year 1902 • Purdue
7-2-1 • SRS 1.5 • SP Overall —
James McWeeney holds a 0.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James McWeeney | |||||
| Notre Dame | 1899-1899 | 1 | 6-3-1 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Charles Best | |||||
| Purdue | 1902-1902 | 1 | 7-2-1 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →James McWeeney
6-3-1 • 65.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Notre Dame 1899
SRS 1.5
Worst Season
Notre Dame 1899
SRS 1.5
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Charles Best
7-2-1 • 75.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Purdue 1902
SRS 1.5
Worst Season
Purdue 1902
SRS 1.5
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.