Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Arthur Curtis
Arthur Curtis: 60th pct vs Otis Douglas: 45th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Otis DouglasArthur Curtis
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Otis Douglas vs Arthur Curtis
Otis Douglas: 60th pct vs Arthur Curtis: 58th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Otis Douglas
Otis Douglas: 84th pct vs Arthur Curtis: 80th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Arthur Curtis vs Otis Douglas
Arthur Curtis: 0 titles vs Otis Douglas: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Arthur Curtis vs Otis Douglas
Arthur Curtis: 3 seasons vs Otis Douglas: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Arthur Curtis
Arthur Curtis: 62.5% vs Otis Douglas: 30.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Otis Douglas
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Arthur Curtis
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Otis DouglasArthur Curtis
EliteStrongAverageLean
Arthur Curtis: 1903 Wisconsin
1902Actual season year • SRS range -2.0 to 9.41952
Active comparison point
Otis Douglas • 1951
1951 Arkansas
Best seasonBiggest improvement5-5 • SRS 9.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+4.7
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Arthur Curtis
Nearest year 1904 • Wisconsin
5-3 • SRS 6.2 • SP Overall —
Otis Douglas holds a 3.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otis Douglas | |||||
| Arkansas | 1950-1952 | 3 | 9-21 | 4.5 | 9.4 |
| Arthur Curtis | |||||
| Kansas | 1902-1902 | 1 | 6-4 | -2.0 | -2.0 |
| Wisconsin | 1903-1904 | 2 | 11-6-1 | 7.4Best quality | 8.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Otis Douglas
9-21 • 30.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
84th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Arkansas 1951
SRS 9.4
Worst Season
Arkansas 1952
SRS -0.6
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas 1951
4.7 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Arthur Curtis
17-10-1 • 62.5% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
60th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Wisconsin 1903
SRS 8.6
Worst Season
Kansas 1902
SRS -2.0
Biggest Improvement
Wisconsin 1903
10.6 SRS