Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches

Choose two to four coaches

Jumbo StiehmMilt Bruhn

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Narrow edge

Edge: Milt Bruhn

Milt Bruhn: 82nd pct vs Jumbo Stiehm: 78th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Narrow edge

Edge: Milt Bruhn

Milt Bruhn: 97th pct vs Jumbo Stiehm: 92nd pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Jumbo Stiehm vs Milt Bruhn

Jumbo Stiehm: 9th pct vs Milt Bruhn: 8th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Jumbo Stiehm vs Milt Bruhn

Jumbo Stiehm: 0 titles vs Milt Bruhn: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: Jumbo Stiehm vs Milt Bruhn

Jumbo Stiehm: 11 seasons vs Milt Bruhn: 11 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Decisive edge

Edge: Jumbo Stiehm

Jumbo Stiehm: 72.2% vs Milt Bruhn: 53.4%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Jumbo Stiehm

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall: —

—

Insufficient sample

Milt Bruhn

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall: —

—

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Jumbo StiehmMilt Bruhn

EliteStrongAverageLean

Higher peak

Milt Bruhn reached the best single-season peak.

Stronger late run

Jumbo Stiehm closed stronger late in the arc.

Jumbo Stiehm: 1916 Indiana

1911Actual season year • SRS range -15.2 to 29.61966

Active comparison point

Jumbo Stiehm • 1915

Selected

1915 Nebraska

Best season

8-0 • SRS 24.4 • SP Overall —

Win %

100.0%

YoY SRS

+1.6

SP Off / Def

— / —

Finish

Unranked

Open coach profile →

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Milt Bruhn

Nearest year 1956 • Wisconsin

Profile

1-5-3 • SRS 6.9 • SP Overall —

Jumbo Stiehm holds a 17.5-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

School	Years	Seasons	Record	Avg SRS	Peak
Jumbo Stiehm
Nebraska	1911-1915	5	35-2-3	17.6Best quality	24.4
Indiana	1916-1921	6	20-18-1	6.6	16.7
Milt Bruhn
Wisconsin	1956-1966	11	52-45-6	9.9	29.6Highest peak

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Broader school footprint

Jumbo Stiehm

55-20-4 • 72.2% • 11 seasons • 0 titles

2 schools across the tracked career.

Full profile →

Best Season

Nebraska 1915

SRS 24.4

Worst Season

Indiana 1916

SRS -15.2

Biggest Improvement

Indiana 1917

31.9 SRS

Better floor

Milt Bruhn

52-45-6 • 53.4% • 11 seasons • 0 titles

-8.4 worst-season SRS.

Full profile →

Best Season

Wisconsin 1962

SRS 29.6

Worst Season

Wisconsin 1966

SRS -8.4

Biggest Improvement

Wisconsin 1962

18.7 SRS