Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Scott Satterfield
Scott Satterfield: 57th pct vs Phil Dickens: 51st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Phil DickensScott Satterfield
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Phil Dickens vs Scott Satterfield
Phil Dickens: 65th pct vs Scott Satterfield: 64th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Scott Satterfield
Scott Satterfield: 68th pct vs Phil Dickens: 61st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Phil Dickens vs Scott Satterfield
Phil Dickens: 0 titles vs Scott Satterfield: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Phil Dickens vs Scott Satterfield
Phil Dickens: 12 seasons vs Scott Satterfield: 12 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Scott Satterfield
Scott Satterfield: 58.8% vs Phil Dickens: 48.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Scott Satterfield sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeScott Satterfield sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Phil Dickens
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Scott Satterfield
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.5
69th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Phil DickensScott Satterfield
EliteStrongAverageLean
Phil Dickens: 1958 IndianaScott Satterfield: 2019 LouisvilleScott Satterfield: 2023 Cincinnati
1953Actual season year • SRS range -8.2 to 11.42025
Active comparison point
Phil Dickens • 1962
1962 Indiana
Best season3-6 • SRS 11.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
33.3%
YoY SRS
+8.6
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Scott Satterfield
Nearest year 2014 • App State
7-5 • SRS -8.2 • SP Overall -8.3
Phil Dickens holds a 19.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Dickens | |||||
| Wyoming | 1953-1956 | 4 | 29-11-1 | -3.0 | 0.7 |
| Indiana | 1958-1964 | 7 | 20-41-2 | 5.8 | 11.4Longest stop |
| Scott Satterfield | |||||
| App State | 2014-2018 | 5 | 47-16 | 2.3 | 10.7 |
| Louisville | 2019-2022 | 4 | 25-24 | 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Cincinnati | 2023-2025 | 3 | 8-16 | 1.2 | 4.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Phil Dickens
49-52-3 • 48.6% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Indiana 1962
SRS 11.4
Worst Season
Wyoming 1954
SRS -6.6
Biggest Improvement
Indiana 1958
10.1 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Scott Satterfield
80-56 • 58.8% • 12 seasons • 0 titles
68th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
App State 2018
SRS 10.7
Worst Season
App State 2014
SRS -8.2
Biggest Improvement
App State 2015
10.6 SRS