Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Matt Wells
Matt Wells: 52nd pct vs Tom Allen: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Matt Wells
Matt Wells: 52nd pct vs Tom Allen: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Matt Wells vs Tom Allen
Matt Wells: 71st pct vs Tom Allen: 69th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Tom Allen
Tom Allen: 57th pct vs Matt Wells: 52nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Matt Wells vs Tom Allen
Matt Wells: 0 titles vs Tom Allen: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Matt Wells vs Tom Allen
Matt Wells: 9 seasons vs Tom Allen: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Matt Wells
Matt Wells: 52.8% vs Tom Allen: 40.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Matt Wells and Tom Allen look similar in overall strength.
Matt Wells and Tom Allen look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tom Allen
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 2.3
65th pct
Above average
Matt Wells
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 2.8
66th pct
Above average
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-2 • SRS 13.2 • SP Overall 11.2
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
+6.4
SP Off / Def
33.6 / 22.6
Finish
#12
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Matt Wells
Nearest year 2020 • Texas Tech
4-6 • SRS -1.4 • SP Overall -4.2
Tom Allen holds a 14.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +5.2 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Allen | |||||
| Indiana | 2016-2023 | 8 | 33-49 | 1.8 | 13.2Longest stop |
| Matt Wells | |||||
| Utah State | 2013-2018 | 6 | 44-34 | 1.5 | 13.9 |
| Texas Tech | 2019-2021 | 3 | 13-17 | -0.3 | 2.3 |
Closing takeaway
33-49 • 40.2% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
57th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Indiana 2020
SRS 13.2
Worst Season
Indiana 2021
SRS -6.9
Biggest Improvement
Indiana 2020
6.4 SRS
57-51 • 52.8% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
52nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Utah State 2018
SRS 13.9
Worst Season
Utah State 2016
SRS -9.3
Biggest Improvement
Utah State 2018
19.1 SRS