Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Chuck Taylor
Chuck Taylor: 77th pct vs Robert Voigts: 72nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Robert VoigtsChuck Taylor
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Robert Voigts
Robert Voigts: 79th pct vs Chuck Taylor: 73rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Robert Voigts
Robert Voigts: 80th pct vs Chuck Taylor: 73rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Taylor vs Robert Voigts
Chuck Taylor: 0 titles vs Robert Voigts: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Robert Voigts vs Chuck Taylor
Robert Voigts: 8 seasons vs Chuck Taylor: 7 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Chuck Taylor
Chuck Taylor: 57.8% vs Robert Voigts: 45.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Robert Voigts
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Chuck Taylor
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Robert VoigtsChuck Taylor
EliteStrongAverageLean
1947Actual season year • SRS range -2.6 to 17.51957
Active comparison point
Robert Voigts • 1948
1948 Northwestern
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-2 • SRS 17.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
+8.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#7
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chuck Taylor
Nearest year 1951 • Stanford
9-2 • SRS 11.4 • SP Overall —
Robert Voigts holds a 6.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Voigts | |||||
| Northwestern | 1947-1954 | 8 | 33-39-1 | 8.0 | 17.5Highest peak |
| Chuck Taylor | |||||
| Stanford | 1951-1957 | 7 | 40-29-2 | 8.2 | 14.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Robert Voigts
33-39-1 • 45.9% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
80th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Northwestern 1948
SRS 17.5
Worst Season
Northwestern 1953
SRS 2.4
Biggest Improvement
Northwestern 1948
8.5 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Chuck Taylor
40-29-2 • 57.8% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
77th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Stanford 1955
SRS 14.9
Worst Season
Stanford 1954
SRS -2.6
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 1955
17.5 SRS