Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Herman Olcott
Herman Olcott: 59th pct vs Charles Hammett: 46th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Charles HammettHerman Olcott
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Charles Hammett
Charles Hammett: 68th pct vs Herman Olcott: 64th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Charles Hammett
Charles Hammett: 34th pct vs Herman Olcott: 28th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charles Hammett vs Herman Olcott
Charles Hammett: 0 titles vs Herman Olcott: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Charles Hammett vs Herman Olcott
Charles Hammett: 3 seasons vs Herman Olcott: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Herman Olcott
Herman Olcott: 68.8% vs Charles Hammett: 38.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charles Hammett
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Herman Olcott
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Charles HammettHerman Olcott
EliteStrongAverageLean
1910Actual season year • SRS range -9.2 to 12.81917
Active comparison point
Charles Hammett • 1912
1912 Northwestern
Best seasonBiggest improvement2-3-1 • SRS 12.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
41.7%
YoY SRS
+15.9
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Herman Olcott
Nearest year 1915 • Kansas
6-2 • SRS 3.4 • SP Overall —
Charles Hammett holds a 9.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Hammett | |||||
| Northwestern | 1910-1912 | 3 | 6-10-2 | 1.9 | 12.8Highest peak |
| Herman Olcott | |||||
| Kansas | 1915-1917 | 3 | 16-7-1 | 1.7 | 10.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Charles Hammett
6-10-2 • 38.9% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
34th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Northwestern 1912
SRS 12.8
Worst Season
Northwestern 1910
SRS -4.1
Biggest Improvement
Northwestern 1912
15.9 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Herman Olcott
16-7-1 • 68.8% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
59th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Kansas 1917
SRS 10.9
Worst Season
Kansas 1916
SRS -9.2
Biggest Improvement
Kansas 1917
20.1 SRS