Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Chris Petersen vs Jimbo Fisher
Chris Petersen: 96th pct vs Jimbo Fisher: 95th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Chris PetersenJimbo Fisher
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Jimbo Fisher vs Chris Petersen
Jimbo Fisher: 97th pct vs Chris Petersen: 95th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Jimbo Fisher
Jimbo Fisher: 63rd pct vs Chris Petersen: 53rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Jimbo Fisher
Jimbo Fisher: 1 title vs Chris Petersen: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chris Petersen vs Jimbo Fisher
Chris Petersen: 14 seasons vs Jimbo Fisher: 14 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Chris Petersen
Chris Petersen: 79.5% vs Jimbo Fisher: 72.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jimbo Fisher and Chris Petersen look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarJimbo Fisher and Chris Petersen look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Chris Petersen
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 17.9
96th pct
Elite
Jimbo Fisher
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 22.1
98th pct
Elite
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Chris PetersenJimbo Fisher
EliteStrongAverageLean
Chris Petersen: 2014 WashingtonJimbo Fisher: 2018 Texas A&M
2006Actual season year • SRS range 3.3 to 31.32023
Active comparison point
Chris Petersen • 2016
2016 Washington
Best seasonBiggest improvement12-2 • SRS 27.3 • SP Overall 26.7
Win %
85.7%
YoY SRS
+13.6
SP Off / Def
40.2 / 13.9
Finish
#4
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jimbo Fisher
Nearest year 2016 • Florida State
10-3 • SRS 17.5 • SP Overall 24.0
Chris Petersen holds a 9.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -2.4 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Petersen | |||||
| Boise State | 2006-2013 | 8 | 92-12 | 14.3 | 24.4 |
| Washington | 2014-2019 | 6 | 55-26 | 16.2 | 27.3 |
| Jimbo Fisher | |||||
| Florida State | 2010-2017 | 8 | 83-23 | 17.0 | 31.3Highest peak |
| Texas A&M | 2018-2023 | 6 | 45-25 | 11.9 | 17.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Chris Petersen
147-38 • 79.5% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Washington 2016
SRS 27.3
Worst Season
Boise State 2013
SRS 4.9
Biggest Improvement
Washington 2016
13.6 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Jimbo Fisher
128-48 • 72.7% • 14 seasons • 1 title
63rd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Florida State 2013
SRS 31.3
Worst Season
Texas A&M 2022
SRS 3.3
Biggest Improvement
Florida State 2013
13.7 SRS