Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Matt Campbell
Matt Campbell: 77th pct vs OE Hollingbery: 66th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Matt CampbellOE Hollingbery
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: OE Hollingbery
OE Hollingbery: 77th pct vs Matt Campbell: 72nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Matt Campbell vs OE Hollingbery
Matt Campbell: 59th pct vs OE Hollingbery: 58th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Matt Campbell vs OE Hollingbery
Matt Campbell: 0 titles vs OE Hollingbery: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: OE Hollingbery
OE Hollingbery: 17 seasons vs Matt Campbell: 15 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: OE Hollingbery
OE Hollingbery: 62.5% vs Matt Campbell: 60.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Matt Campbell sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMatt Campbell sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Matt Campbell
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 7.1
78th pct
Strong
OE Hollingbery
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Matt CampbellOE Hollingbery
EliteStrongAverageLean
Matt Campbell: 2016 Iowa State
1926Actual season year • SRS range -5.3 to 16.42025
Active comparison point
Matt Campbell • 2017
2017 Iowa State
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-5 • SRS 14.3 • SP Overall 7.5
Win %
61.5%
YoY SRS
+16.0
SP Off / Def
38.2 / 30.7
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
OE Hollingbery
Nearest year 1942 • Washington State
6-2-2 • SRS 0.9 • SP Overall —
Matt Campbell holds a 13.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Campbell | |||||
| Toledo | 2011-2015 | 5 | 35-15 | 2.0 | 10.2 |
| Iowa State | 2016-2025 | 10 | 64-51 | 10.0Best quality | 14.3 |
| OE Hollingbery | |||||
| Washington State | 1926-1942 | 17 | 93-53-14 | 6.5 | 16.4Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Matt Campbell
99-66 • 60.0% • 15 seasons • 0 titles
77th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Iowa State 2017
SRS 14.3
Worst Season
Toledo 2014
SRS -4.1
Biggest Improvement
Iowa State 2017
16.0 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →OE Hollingbery
93-53-14 • 62.5% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
16.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Washington State 1928
SRS 16.4
Worst Season
Washington State 1939
SRS -5.3
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 1928
13.8 SRS