Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Chuck Banker
Chuck Banker: 35th pct vs Jim Hilles: 26th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Chuck BankerJim Hilles
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Banker vs Jim Hilles
Chuck Banker: 26th pct vs Jim Hilles: 26th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Banker vs Jim Hilles
Chuck Banker: 0 titles vs Jim Hilles: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chuck Banker vs Jim Hilles
Chuck Banker: 1 seasons vs Jim Hilles: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Chuck Banker
Chuck Banker: 50.0% vs Jim Hilles: 25.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jim Hilles and Chuck Banker look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarJim Hilles and Chuck Banker look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Chuck Banker
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -3.4
46th pct
Mixed
Jim Hilles
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -2.8
47th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Chuck BankerJim Hilles
EliteStrongAverageLean
1985Actual season year • SRS range -3.9 to -3.81987
Active comparison point
Chuck Banker • 1986
1986 Iowa State
Best seasonWorst season1-1 • SRS -3.8 • SP Overall -3.4
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
24.5 / 27.8
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Hilles
Nearest year 1986 • Wisconsin
3-9 • SRS -3.9 • SP Overall -2.8
Chuck Banker holds a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +2.5 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Banker | |||||
| Iowa State | 1986-1986 | 1 | 1-1 | -3.8 | -3.8 |
| Jim Hilles | |||||
| Wisconsin | 1986-1986 | 1 | 3-9 | -3.9 | -3.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Chuck Banker
1-1 • 50.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
35th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Iowa State 1986
SRS -3.8
Worst Season
Iowa State 1986
SRS -3.8
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Jim Hilles
3-9 • 25.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Wisconsin 1986
SRS -3.9
Worst Season
Wisconsin 1986
SRS -3.9
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—