Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Fred Zechman vs Fred Vonappen
Fred Zechman: 8th pct vs Fred Vonappen: 6th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Fred VonappenFred Zechman
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Fred Zechman vs Fred Vonappen
Fred Zechman: 13th pct vs Fred Vonappen: 12th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Fred Vonappen
Fred Vonappen: 56th pct vs Fred Zechman: 51st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Fred Vonappen vs Fred Zechman
Fred Vonappen: 0 titles vs Fred Zechman: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Fred Vonappen vs Fred Zechman
Fred Vonappen: 3 seasons vs Fred Zechman: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Fred Zechman
Fred Zechman: 24.2% vs Fred Vonappen: 13.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Fred Zechman and Fred Vonappen look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarFred Zechman and Fred Vonappen look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Fred Vonappen
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -22.8
5th pct
Lower end
Fred Zechman
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -22.0
5th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Fred VonappenFred Zechman
EliteStrongAverageLean
1983Actual season year • SRS range -27.1 to -11.21998
Active comparison point
Fred Vonappen • 1997
1997 Hawai'i
Best seasonBiggest improvement3-9 • SRS -12.1 • SP Overall -15.0
Win %
25.0%
YoY SRS
+10.0
SP Off / Def
17.2 / 31.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fred Zechman
Nearest year 1985 • New Mexico State
1-10 • SRS -25.2 • SP Overall -25.0
Fred Vonappen holds a 13.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -2.1 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Vonappen | |||||
| Hawai'i | 1996-1998 | 3 | 5-31 | -20.4 | -12.1 |
| Fred Zechman | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1983-1985 | 3 | 8-25 | -20.6 | -11.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Fred Vonappen
5-31 • 13.9% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
56th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Hawai'i 1997
SRS -12.1
Worst Season
Hawai'i 1998
SRS -27.1
Biggest Improvement
Hawai'i 1997
10.0 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Fred Zechman
8-25 • 24.2% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1983
SRS -11.2
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1984
SRS -25.4
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1985
0.2 SRS