Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Greg McMackin
Greg McMackin: 42nd pct vs Jeff Tisdel: 37th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Greg McMackin
Greg McMackin: 42nd pct vs Jeff Tisdel: 37th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Greg McMackin
Greg McMackin: 55th pct vs Jeff Tisdel: 42nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Jeff Tisdel vs Greg McMackin
Jeff Tisdel: 41st pct vs Greg McMackin: 38th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Greg McMackin vs Jeff Tisdel
Greg McMackin: 0 titles vs Jeff Tisdel: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Greg McMackin vs Jeff Tisdel
Greg McMackin: 4 seasons vs Jeff Tisdel: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Greg McMackin
Greg McMackin: 54.7% vs Jeff Tisdel: 51.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Greg McMackin has the edge in overall strength.
Greg McMackin has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Greg McMackin
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -1.4
52th pct
Mixed
Jeff Tisdel
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -4.7
43th pct
Mixed
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-4 • SRS 7.4 • SP Overall 12.8
Win %
71.4%
YoY SRS
+19.2
SP Off / Def
39.5 / 26.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jeff Tisdel
Nearest year 1999 • Nevada
3-8 • SRS -16.7 • SP Overall -16.2
Greg McMackin holds a 24.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +7.5 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg McMackin | |||||
| Hawai'i | 2008-2011 | 4 | 29-25 | -5.2 | 7.4Highest peak |
| Jeff Tisdel | |||||
| Nevada | 1996-1999 | 4 | 23-22 | -5.9 | 3.1 |
Closing takeaway
29-25 • 54.7% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
7.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Hawai'i 2010
SRS 7.4
Worst Season
Hawai'i 2009
SRS -11.8
Biggest Improvement
Hawai'i 2010
19.2 SRS
23-22 • 51.1% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Nevada 1996
SRS 3.1
Worst Season
Nevada 1999
SRS -16.7
Biggest Improvement
Nevada 1998
-4.9 SRS