Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Dick Offenhamer
Dick Offenhamer: 31st pct vs Timmy Chang: 20th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Timmy ChangDick Offenhamer
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Timmy Chang
Timmy Chang: 28th pct vs Dick Offenhamer: 19th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Dick Offenhamer vs Timmy Chang
Dick Offenhamer: 71st pct vs Timmy Chang: 69th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dick Offenhamer vs Timmy Chang
Dick Offenhamer: 0 titles vs Timmy Chang: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dick Offenhamer vs Timmy Chang
Dick Offenhamer: 4 seasons vs Timmy Chang: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Dick Offenhamer
Dick Offenhamer: 59.5% vs Timmy Chang: 34.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Timmy Chang sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTimmy Chang sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Timmy Chang
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.6
21th pct
Lower end
Dick Offenhamer
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Timmy ChangDick Offenhamer
EliteStrongAverageLean
1962Actual season year • SRS range -20.8 to -3.32025
Active comparison point
Timmy Chang • 2025
2025 Hawai'i
Best seasonBiggest improvement0-0 • SRS -3.3 • SP Overall 1.7
Win %
—
YoY SRS
+9.6
SP Off / Def
27.3 / 27.3
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dick Offenhamer
Nearest year 1965 • Buffalo
5-3-2 • SRS -9.1 • SP Overall —
Timmy Chang holds a 5.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timmy Chang | |||||
| Hawai'i | 2022-2025 | 4 | 13-25 | -11.8 | -3.3Highest peak |
| Dick Offenhamer | |||||
| Buffalo | 1962-1965 | 4 | 20-13-4 | -11.6 | -8.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Timmy Chang
13-25 • 34.2% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
-3.3 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Hawai'i 2025
SRS -3.3
Worst Season
Hawai'i 2022
SRS -18.4
Biggest Improvement
Hawai'i 2025
9.6 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Dick Offenhamer
20-13-4 • 59.5% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
31st pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Buffalo 1964
SRS -8.0
Worst Season
Buffalo 1962
SRS -20.8
Biggest Improvement
Buffalo 1963
12.2 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.