Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: WS Whitney vs Frank Longman
WS Whitney: 22nd pct vs Frank Longman: 19th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
WS WhitneyFrank Longman
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Frank Longman vs WS Whitney
Frank Longman: 19th pct vs WS Whitney: 19th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Longman vs WS Whitney
Frank Longman: 0 titles vs WS Whitney: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Frank Longman vs WS Whitney
Frank Longman: 2 seasons vs WS Whitney: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: WS Whitney
WS Whitney: 46.7% vs Frank Longman: 40.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
WS Whitney
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Frank Longman
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
WS WhitneyFrank Longman
EliteStrongAverageLean
1906Actual season year • SRS range -19.0 to -8.11907
Active comparison point
WS Whitney • 1907
1907 Georgia
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest drop4-3-1 • SRS -8.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
56.3%
YoY SRS
+10.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Frank Longman
Nearest year 1907 • Arkansas
3-4-1 • SRS -8.1 • SP Overall —
WS Whitney trails by a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS Whitney | |||||
| Georgia | 1906-1907 | 2 | 6-7-2 | -13.3 | -8.2 |
| Frank Longman | |||||
| Arkansas | 1906-1907 | 2 | 5-8-3 | -13.6 | -8.1 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →WS Whitney
6-7-2 • 46.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Georgia 1907
SRS -8.2
Worst Season
Georgia 1906
SRS -18.3
Biggest Improvement
Georgia 1907
10.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Frank Longman
5-8-3 • 40.6% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Arkansas 1907
SRS -8.1
Worst Season
Arkansas 1906
SRS -19.0
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas 1907
10.9 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.