Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Mark Richt
Mark Richt: 94th pct vs Chick Meehan: 77th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mark RichtChick Meehan
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Mark Richt
Mark Richt: 91st pct vs Chick Meehan: 80th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Mark Richt vs Chick Meehan
Mark Richt: 80th pct vs Chick Meehan: 79th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Chick Meehan vs Mark Richt
Chick Meehan: 0 titles vs Mark Richt: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chick Meehan vs Mark Richt
Chick Meehan: 18 seasons vs Mark Richt: 18 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Chick Meehan
Chick Meehan: 76.3% vs Mark Richt: 72.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mark Richt sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMark Richt sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mark Richt
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 21.2
98th pct
Elite
Chick Meehan
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mark RichtChick Meehan
EliteStrongAverageLean
Mark Richt: 2016 MiamiChick Meehan: 1937 Manhattan
1920Actual season year • SRS range 4.3 to 23.72018
Active comparison point
Mark Richt • 2014
2014 Georgia
Best season10-3 • SRS 23.7 • SP Overall 27.6
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+8.6
SP Off / Def
44.2 / 16.8
Finish
#9
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chick Meehan
Nearest year 1937 • Manhattan
6-3-1 • SRS 4.3 • SP Overall —
Mark Richt holds a 19.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Richt | |||||
| Georgia | 2001-2015 | 15 | 145-51 | 15.4 | 23.7Highest peak |
| Miami | 2016-2018 | 3 | 26-13 | 13.2 | 16.8 |
| Chick Meehan | |||||
| Syracuse | 1920-1924 | 5 | 35-8-4 | 14.8 | 18.0 |
| Manhattan | 1937-1937 | 1 | 6-3-1 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Mark Richt
171-64 • 72.8% • 18 seasons • 0 titles
94th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Georgia 2014
SRS 23.7
Worst Season
Miami 2018
SRS 6.9
Biggest Improvement
Georgia 2012
9.7 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Chick Meehan
41-11-5 • 76.3% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Syracuse 1923
SRS 18.0
Worst Season
Manhattan 1937
SRS 4.3
Biggest Improvement
Syracuse 1923
2.8 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.