Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Branch Bocock
Branch Bocock: 53rd pct vs Skip Holtz: 46th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Branch BocockSkip Holtz
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Skip Holtz
Skip Holtz: 63rd pct vs Branch Bocock: 56th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Skip Holtz vs Branch Bocock
Skip Holtz: 43rd pct vs Branch Bocock: 42nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Branch Bocock vs Skip Holtz
Branch Bocock: 0 titles vs Skip Holtz: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Branch Bocock
Branch Bocock: 19 seasons vs Skip Holtz: 17 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Branch Bocock
Branch Bocock: 69.8% vs Skip Holtz: 54.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Skip Holtz sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeSkip Holtz sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Branch Bocock
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Skip Holtz
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -2.3
49th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Branch BocockSkip Holtz
EliteStrongAverageLean
Branch Bocock: 1909 Virginia TechBranch Bocock: 1911 North CarolinaBranch Bocock: 1912 Virginia TechBranch Bocock: 1925 South CarolinaSkip Holtz: 2010 South FloridaSkip Holtz: 2013 Louisiana Tech
1908Actual season year • SRS range -21.5 to 10.62021
Active comparison point
Branch Bocock • 1909
1909 Virginia Tech
Best seasonBiggest improvementNew stop: Virginia Tech6-1 • SRS 7.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
85.7%
YoY SRS
+21.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Skip Holtz
Nearest year 2005 • East Carolina
5-6 • SRS -9.1 • SP Overall -4.6
Branch Bocock holds a 16.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branch Bocock | |||||
| Georgia | 1908-1908 | 1 | 5-2-1 | -13.4 | -13.4 |
| Virginia Tech | 1909-1915 | 6 | 34-14-2 | 1.9Best quality | 7.8 |
| North Carolina | 1911-1911 | 1 | 6-1-1 | -9.6 | -9.6 |
| South Carolina | 1925-1926 | 2 | 13-7 | -5.4 | -4.0 |
| Skip Holtz | |||||
| East Carolina | 2005-2009 | 5 | 38-27 | -1.7 | 5.0 |
| South Florida | 2010-2012 | 3 | 16-21 | -0.3 | 4.2 |
| Louisiana Tech | 2013-2021 | 9 | 64-50 | -5.0 | 10.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Branch Bocock
58-24-4 • 69.8% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
-13.4 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Virginia Tech 1909
SRS 7.8
Worst Season
Georgia 1908
SRS -13.4
Biggest Improvement
Virginia Tech 1909
21.2 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Skip Holtz
118-98 • 54.6% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
10.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Louisiana Tech 2014
SRS 10.6
Worst Season
Louisiana Tech 2013
SRS -21.5
Biggest Improvement
Louisiana Tech 2014
32.1 SRS