Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: George Bohler vs Warren Harper
George Bohler: 13th pct vs Warren Harper: 13th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
George BohlerWarren Harper
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Warren Harper vs George Bohler
Warren Harper: 14th pct vs George Bohler: 13th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: George Bohler vs Warren Harper
George Bohler: 0 titles vs Warren Harper: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: George Bohler vs Warren Harper
George Bohler: 2 seasons vs Warren Harper: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: George Bohler vs Warren Harper
George Bohler: 21.4% vs Warren Harper: 20.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
George Bohler
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Warren Harper
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
George BohlerWarren Harper
EliteStrongAverageLean
1928Actual season year • SRS range -15.3 to -11.01964
Active comparison point
George Bohler • 1928
1928 Auburn
Best season1-8 • SRS -11.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
11.1%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Warren Harper
Nearest year 1963 • UTEP
3-7 • SRS -11.0 • SP Overall —
George Bohler trails by a 0.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Bohler | |||||
| Auburn | 1928-1929 | 2 | 3-11 | -13.0 | -11.2 |
| Warren Harper | |||||
| UTEP | 1963-1964 | 2 | 3-15-2 | -13.2 | -11.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →George Bohler
3-11 • 21.4% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Auburn 1928
SRS -11.2
Worst Season
Auburn 1929
SRS -14.8
Biggest Improvement
Auburn 1929
-3.6 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Warren Harper
3-15-2 • 20.0% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
UTEP 1963
SRS -11.0
Worst Season
UTEP 1964
SRS -15.3
Biggest Improvement
UTEP 1964
-4.3 SRS