Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: William Alexander
William Alexander: 80th pct vs George Sanford: 69th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
William AlexanderGeorge Sanford
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: George Sanford vs William Alexander
George Sanford: 91st pct vs William Alexander: 88th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: William Alexander
William Alexander: 40th pct vs George Sanford: 28th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: George Sanford vs William Alexander
George Sanford: 0 titles vs William Alexander: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: George Sanford vs William Alexander
George Sanford: 25 seasons vs William Alexander: 25 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: George Sanford
George Sanford: 62.5% vs William Alexander: 58.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
William Alexander
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
George Sanford
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
William AlexanderGeorge Sanford
EliteStrongAverageLean
George Sanford: 1914 Rutgers
1899Actual season year • SRS range -6.0 to 24.01944
Active comparison point
William Alexander • 1942
1942 Georgia Tech
Best seasonBiggest improvement9-2 • SRS 21.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
81.8%
YoY SRS
+20.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#5
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George Sanford
Nearest year 1923 • Rutgers
7-1-1 • SRS 10.6 • SP Overall —
William Alexander holds a 11.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Alexander | |||||
| Georgia Tech | 1920-1944 | 25 | 134-95-15 | 7.5 | 21.9Longest stop |
| George Sanford | |||||
| Columbia | 1899-1901 | 3 | 24-11-1 | 5.4 | 7.0 |
| Rutgers | 1914-1923 | 9 | 43-28-5 | 7.4 | 24.0Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →William Alexander
134-95-15 • 58.0% • 25 seasons • 0 titles
40th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Georgia Tech 1942
SRS 21.9
Worst Season
Georgia Tech 1930
SRS -6.0
Biggest Improvement
Georgia Tech 1942
20.0 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →George Sanford
67-39-6 • 62.5% • 12 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Rutgers 1917
SRS 24.0
Worst Season
Rutgers 1920
SRS -5.7
Biggest Improvement
Rutgers 1923
12.4 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.