Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: George Brooke
George Brooke: 76th pct vs Bob Woodruff: 70th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Bob WoodruffGeorge Brooke
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: George Brooke
George Brooke: 91st pct vs Bob Woodruff: 83rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Bob Woodruff
Bob Woodruff: 71st pct vs George Brooke: 61st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bob Woodruff vs George Brooke
Bob Woodruff: 0 titles vs George Brooke: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bob Woodruff vs George Brooke
Bob Woodruff: 13 seasons vs George Brooke: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: George Brooke
George Brooke: 66.5% vs Bob Woodruff: 57.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Bob Woodruff
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
George Brooke
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Bob WoodruffGeorge Brooke
EliteStrongAverageLean
Bob Woodruff: 1950 FloridaGeorge Brooke: 1913 Pennsylvania
1903Actual season year • SRS range -1.9 to 24.11959
Active comparison point
Bob Woodruff • 1952
1952 Florida
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-3 • SRS 19.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
+10.9
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#15
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George Brooke
Nearest year 1915 • Pennsylvania
3-5-2 • SRS 11.6 • SP Overall —
Bob Woodruff holds a 7.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Woodruff | |||||
| Baylor | 1947-1949 | 3 | 19-10-2 | 12.1 | 17.0 |
| Florida | 1950-1959 | 10 | 53-42-6 | 10.9 | 19.4Longest stop |
| George Brooke | |||||
| Swarthmore | 1903-1912 | 6 | 39-13-1 | 12.9 | 24.1Highest peak |
| Pennsylvania | 1913-1915 | 3 | 13-12-4 | 10.5 | 17.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Bob Woodruff
72-52-8 • 57.6% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
71st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Florida 1952
SRS 19.4
Worst Season
Florida 1950
SRS -1.9
Biggest Improvement
Florida 1952
10.9 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →George Brooke
52-25-5 • 66.5% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
24.1 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Swarthmore 1907
SRS 24.1
Worst Season
Pennsylvania 1914
SRS 2.2
Biggest Improvement
Swarthmore 1907
10.7 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.