Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Matt Simon
Matt Simon: 9th pct vs Garrick McGee: 6th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Garrick McGeeMatt Simon
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Matt Simon vs Garrick McGee
Matt Simon: 6th pct vs Garrick McGee: 6th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Matt Simon
Matt Simon: 89th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Garrick McGee vs Matt Simon
Garrick McGee: 0 titles vs Matt Simon: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Matt Simon vs Garrick McGee
Matt Simon: 3 seasons vs Garrick McGee: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Matt Simon
Matt Simon: 33.3% vs Garrick McGee: 20.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Garrick McGee has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeGarrick McGee has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Garrick McGee
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -15.9
13th pct
Lower end
Matt Simon
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -21.9
5th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Garrick McGeeMatt Simon
EliteStrongAverageLean
1995Actual season year • SRS range -24.9 to -17.62013
Active comparison point
Garrick McGee • 2012
2012 UAB
Best season3-9 • SRS -17.9 • SP Overall -11.1
Win %
25.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
26.6 / 38.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Matt Simon
Nearest year 1997 • North Texas
4-7 • SRS -17.6 • SP Overall -21.7
Garrick McGee trails by a 0.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +5.0 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrick McGee | |||||
| UAB | 2012-2013 | 2 | 5-19 | -20.8 | -17.9 |
| Matt Simon | |||||
| North Texas | 1995-1997 | 3 | 11-22 | -20.0 | -17.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Garrick McGee
5-19 • 20.8% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
UAB 2012
SRS -17.9
Worst Season
UAB 2013
SRS -23.7
Biggest Improvement
UAB 2013
-5.8 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Matt Simon
11-22 • 33.3% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
9th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
North Texas 1996
SRS -17.6
Worst Season
North Texas 1995
SRS -24.9
Biggest Improvement
North Texas 1996
7.3 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.