Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: George Munger vs Dan Mullen
George Munger: 87th pct vs Dan Mullen: 85th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Dan MullenGeorge Munger
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: George Munger
George Munger: 89th pct vs Dan Mullen: 84th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Dan Mullen vs George Munger
Dan Mullen: 56th pct vs George Munger: 54th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dan Mullen vs George Munger
Dan Mullen: 0 titles vs George Munger: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dan Mullen vs George Munger
Dan Mullen: 17 seasons vs George Munger: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: George Munger
George Munger: 64.9% vs Dan Mullen: 62.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dan Mullen sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDan Mullen sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dan Mullen
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 13.1
92th pct
Elite
George Munger
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Dan MullenGeorge Munger
EliteStrongAverageLean
Dan Mullen: 2018 FloridaDan Mullen: 2025 UNLV
1938Actual season year • SRS range -1.2 to 22.62025
Active comparison point
Dan Mullen • 2014
2014 Mississippi State
Best seasonBiggest improvement10-3 • SRS 20.0 • SP Overall 22.2
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+10.9
SP Off / Def
43.2 / 20.7
Finish
#11
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George Munger
Nearest year 1953 • Pennsylvania
3-5-1 • SRS 1.3 • SP Overall —
Dan Mullen holds a 18.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Mullen | |||||
| Mississippi State | 2009-2017 | 9 | 69-46 | 10.6 | 20.0 |
| Florida | 2018-2021 | 4 | 34-15 | 15.6Best quality | 19.8 |
| UNLV | 2025-2025 | 1 | 0-0 | -0.9 | -0.9 |
| George Munger | |||||
| Pennsylvania | 1938-1953 | 16 | 82-42-10 | 10.7 | 22.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Dan Mullen
103-61 • 62.8% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
3 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Mississippi State 2014
SRS 20.0
Worst Season
UNLV 2025
SRS -0.9
Biggest Improvement
Mississippi State 2014
10.9 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →George Munger
82-42-10 • 64.9% • 16 seasons • 0 titles
22.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Pennsylvania 1947
SRS 22.6
Worst Season
Pennsylvania 1939
SRS -1.2
Biggest Improvement
Pennsylvania 1940
17.7 SRS