Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: CJ McCoy
CJ McCoy: 19th pct vs Don Treadwell: 12th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
CJ McCoyDon Treadwell
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Don Treadwell vs CJ McCoy
Don Treadwell: 22nd pct vs CJ McCoy: 21st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: CJ McCoy
CJ McCoy: 22nd pct vs Don Treadwell: 13th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: CJ McCoy vs Don Treadwell
CJ McCoy: 0 titles vs Don Treadwell: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: CJ McCoy vs Don Treadwell
CJ McCoy: 3 seasons vs Don Treadwell: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: CJ McCoy
CJ McCoy: 47.4% vs Don Treadwell: 27.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Don Treadwell sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDon Treadwell sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
CJ McCoy
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Don Treadwell
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -16.8
11th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
CJ McCoyDon Treadwell
EliteStrongAverageLean
1914Actual season year • SRS range -30.2 to -5.92013
Active comparison point
CJ McCoy • 1915
1915 Florida
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-3 • SRS -6.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
57.1%
YoY SRS
+13.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Don Treadwell
Nearest year 2011 • Miami (OH)
4-8 • SRS -5.9 • SP Overall -5.3
CJ McCoy trails by a 0.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJ McCoy | |||||
| Florida | 1914-1916 | 3 | 9-10 | -18.4 | -6.8 |
| Don Treadwell | |||||
| Miami (OH) | 2011-2013 | 3 | 8-21 | -18.2 | -5.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →CJ McCoy
9-10 • 47.4% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
22nd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Florida 1915
SRS -6.8
Worst Season
Florida 1916
SRS -28.6
Biggest Improvement
Florida 1915
13.0 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Don Treadwell
8-21 • 27.6% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Miami (OH) 2011
SRS -5.9
Worst Season
Miami (OH) 2013
SRS -30.2
Biggest Improvement
Miami (OH) 2013
-11.6 SRS