Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Thomas Nugent
Thomas Nugent: 60th pct vs Jack Hagerty: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Thomas NugentJack Hagerty
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Jack Hagerty
Jack Hagerty: 75th pct vs Thomas Nugent: 60th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Thomas Nugent
Thomas Nugent: 43rd pct vs Jack Hagerty: 33rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jack Hagerty vs Thomas Nugent
Jack Hagerty: 0 titles vs Thomas Nugent: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jack Hagerty vs Thomas Nugent
Jack Hagerty: 17 seasons vs Thomas Nugent: 17 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Jack Hagerty
Jack Hagerty: 57.6% vs Thomas Nugent: 52.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Thomas Nugent
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Jack Hagerty
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Thomas NugentJack Hagerty
EliteStrongAverageLean
Thomas Nugent: 1953 Florida StateThomas Nugent: 1959 Maryland
1932Actual season year • SRS range -19.8 to 15.61965
Active comparison point
Thomas Nugent • 1962
1962 Maryland
Best season6-4 • SRS 9.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
+4.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jack Hagerty
Nearest year 1948 • Georgetown
3-4-1 • SRS -7.6 • SP Overall —
Thomas Nugent holds a 16.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Nugent | |||||
| VMI | 1949-1952 | 4 | 19-18-2 | -7.8 | 0.2 |
| Florida State | 1953-1958 | 6 | 34-28-1 | -0.4 | 7.3 |
| Maryland | 1959-1965 | 7 | 36-34 | 2.9Best quality | 9.3 |
| Jack Hagerty | |||||
| Georgetown | 1932-1948 | 14 | 63-45-10 | -1.6 | 15.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Thomas Nugent
89-80-3 • 52.6% • 17 seasons • 0 titles
43rd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Maryland 1962
SRS 9.3
Worst Season
VMI 1952
SRS -19.8
Biggest Improvement
Florida State 1956
14.5 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Jack Hagerty
63-45-10 • 57.6% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
15.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Georgetown 1940
SRS 15.6
Worst Season
Georgetown 1932
SRS -15.0
Biggest Improvement
Georgetown 1940
9.6 SRS