Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Chris Petersen vs Jimbo Fisher
Chris Petersen: 96th pct vs Jimbo Fisher: 95th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jimbo FisherChris Petersen
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Jimbo Fisher vs Chris Petersen
Jimbo Fisher: 97th pct vs Chris Petersen: 95th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Jimbo Fisher
Jimbo Fisher: 63rd pct vs Chris Petersen: 53rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
Narrow edgeEdge: Jimbo Fisher
Jimbo Fisher: 1 title vs Chris Petersen: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Chris Petersen vs Jimbo Fisher
Chris Petersen: 14 seasons vs Jimbo Fisher: 14 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Chris Petersen
Chris Petersen: 79.5% vs Jimbo Fisher: 72.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jimbo Fisher and Chris Petersen look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarJimbo Fisher and Chris Petersen look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jimbo Fisher
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 22.1
98th pct
Elite
Chris Petersen
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 17.9
96th pct
Elite
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jimbo FisherChris Petersen
EliteStrongAverageLean
Jimbo Fisher: 2018 Texas A&MChris Petersen: 2014 Washington
2006Actual season year • SRS range 3.3 to 31.32023
Active comparison point
Jimbo Fisher • 2013
2013 Florida State
Best seasonBiggest improvement14-0 • SRS 31.3 • SP Overall 38.5
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+13.7
SP Off / Def
47.7 / 11.5
Finish
#1
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chris Petersen
Nearest year 2013 • Boise State
8-4 • SRS 4.9 • SP Overall 11.3
Jimbo Fisher holds a 26.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +12.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimbo Fisher | |||||
| Florida State | 2010-2017 | 8 | 83-23 | 17.0 | 31.3Highest peak |
| Texas A&M | 2018-2023 | 6 | 45-25 | 11.9 | 17.9 |
| Chris Petersen | |||||
| Boise State | 2006-2013 | 8 | 92-12 | 14.3 | 24.4 |
| Washington | 2014-2019 | 6 | 55-26 | 16.2 | 27.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Jimbo Fisher
128-48 • 72.7% • 14 seasons • 1 title
63rd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Florida State 2013
SRS 31.3
Worst Season
Texas A&M 2022
SRS 3.3
Biggest Improvement
Florida State 2013
13.7 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Chris Petersen
147-38 • 79.5% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Washington 2016
SRS 27.3
Worst Season
Boise State 2013
SRS 4.9
Biggest Improvement
Washington 2016
13.6 SRS